/*! Contents a.ka. Sitemap page settings */
Political stories, opinions, comments and analysis

Jan 16, 2013

Posted on Jan 16, 2013 , 11:23 AM | Tags : , , , ,


By Gilad Atzmon
Gilad Atzmon argues that British government funding for school visits to Auschwitz is diverting attention from crimes that are committed daily by the Jews-only state of Israel, and that British taxpayers’ money would be better spent on funding school strips to Gaza, Baghdad or Basra.
 Britain’s Conservative Party leader, David Cameron, seems to be struggling these days. After calling government funding for school visits to the former Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz a “gimmick”, he’s facing demands for an apology.

In a speech on Friday 22 February 2008, Cameron accused Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s government of being “obsessed with short-term gimmicks”, including a recommendation for schools to make “trips to Poland”.

The British government announced this month it would give GBP 4.65 million to the Holocaust Educational Trust, set up in 1988, to educate young people about the Holocaust. It wouldn’t take a genius to guess that the Jewish political institutions in Britain were very quick to tear Cameron apart for his comment.

Henry Grunwald, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews said: “The Board of Deputies does not get involved in party politics, but we are surprised and disappointed that David Cameron should in any way have used the word ‘gimmick’ in connection with visits to Auschwitz.”

Karen Pollock, the chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said, “We do not want to be involved in party politics. But you should not use visits to Auschwitz to score political points.”

Seemingly, both Pollock and Grunwald do not like to get involved in “party politics”. For that purpose, they have some very dedicated agents such as Lord Levy, David Abrahams, the Tory Friends of Israel and the Labour Friends of Israel.

The Conservative Party was very quick to understand the message. It immediately surrendered to the “non-political” pressure. Within hours, a Tory spokesman said: “School trips to Auschwitz are a brilliant idea.”

Trying to quell the storm, the Conservative spokesman said, “Cameron was not criticizing the visits, but rather the fact that the government funding did not cover their entire cost.”

Very much like Grunwald and Pollock, I would refrain from interfering with British politics, yet I may suggest that Cameron was absolutely correct. The trips to Auschwitz are indeed a gimmick. As far as I can see, the educational value of these trips is counter-productive.

Unlike Karen Pollock from the Holocaust Educational Trust, who said, “Students use their experience to raise awareness of the lessons of the Holocaust in their schools and local communities, challenging prejudice and racism today,” I am convinced that trips to Auschwitz are there to divert the attention from crimes that are committed on a daily basis before our very eyes and in our names. The trips to Auschwitz are there to silence ethical awareness. They are there to shutter the possibility of self-reflection.

It is indeed rather easy for the British government to spend some money trying to teach young students how bad the Nazis were 63 years ago. Yet, it is far more challenging for the British government and British educational institutes to confront British wrongdoing in the past and in the present.

Instead of sending British youngsters to Auschwitz, I would suggest spending governmental funds on student trips to Gaza concentration camp. This would have a far greater educational value in so as far as challenging “racism and prejudice”. Clearly, it is in Gaza where millions of Palestinians are starved by the Jewish state while the West keeps silent.

Britain bears some direct responsibility for the Palestinian tragedy. Firstly, the Palestinian disaster was created by the British Empire. It may have started with the Balfour Declaration, but it matured into devastating ethnic cleansing in 1948, three years after the liberation of Auschwitz. Secondly, whichever way we decide to look at the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Palestinians are the last victims of Hitler and the genocide in Gaza is a Shoah in the making. 

If Karen Pollock is truly concerned about “racism and prejudice”, Gaza is the place to send the British kids to, so they can come home and ask their grandparents: “Grandpa, what did you do when it all happened 60 years ago?” We have to send our kids to Gaza so they can come home and ask their parents: “Mum, what can we do to help the Palestinians?”

If Karen Pollock still wants to increase our kids’ ethical awareness but might not be convinced that Gaza is the place to do so, she may want to consider sending our youth to Basra or Baghdad. At the end of the day, the genocide of the Iraqi people, in which one and a half million Iraqis have died so far, is a war crime committed also by the current British government.

But on second thought, there is no point in sending young British students to Baghdad; they can go there as soon they finish school. They can then participate and contribute to this very contemporary Holocaust that is being committed by Britain and America in the name of democracy and neo-conservative ideology. All they have to do is simply join the British armed forces.


Top Stories
Archive

Archive

Recent 10 comments

Comments